It varies, but most Tax Court proceedings are resolved within 6 to 12 months.
In today’s increasingly regulated business environment, tax compliance has become a top priority for companies operating in Indonesia. However, even the most diligent taxpayers may find themselves at odds with the tax authority due to differing interpretations of tax laws or audit findings. This situation can lead to what is formally known as a tax dispute. Understanding the Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Indonesia is essential for business owners, corporate leaders, and investors who seek to mitigate legal risk, preserve reputations, and safeguard financial interests. Tax disputes are not merely bureaucratic hurdles—they can significantly impact a company’s cash flow and long-term strategy if not handled appropriately.
Tax disputes usually arise when there is a disagreement between the taxpayer and the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) over the amount of tax owed. These disagreements are often triggered by tax audits, where the DGT may reassess your income, reclassify expenses, or reject your claims for VAT refunds. Other frequent causes include alleged underreporting, transfer pricing adjustments, and procedural non-compliance. For instance, multinational companies with complex intercompany transactions often face challenges related to transfer pricing documentation. Therefore, it’s important to anticipate where disputes may arise and to proactively manage tax compliance with a strategic lens.
To resolve tax disputes fairly and systematically, Indonesia has established a legal framework that outlines the rights and obligations of both taxpayers and the tax authorities. The key regulations include Law No. No. 7 of 2021 on Harmonization of Tax Regulations, Law No. 14 of 2002 on the Tax Court, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2018 concerning judicial review procedures. These laws define a step-by-step pathway that taxpayers must follow to resolve disputes, including objection, appeal, and judicial review. Moreover, each stage is bound by strict deadlines and procedural requirements, making it vital to understand and adhere to the proper legal process.
The first formal step in the tax dispute resolution process is filing an objection with the Directorate General of Taxes. This must be done within three months from the date of the tax assessment letter (SKP) or other official notification. The objection must be submitted in writing and clearly outline the taxpayer’s reasons for disagreement. It should also include supporting documents such as financial records, legal arguments, and relevant evidence. Importantly, the full amount of the tax assessed must be paid in advance—a condition known as “pay first, argue later.” While this may seem burdensome, it underscores the importance of preparing strong documentation and seeking professional assistance early.
Once the objection is submitted, the DGT has up to 12 months to issue a decision. If no response is received within this period, the objection is automatically considered rejected. During this time, it is critical for taxpayers to maintain communication with the DGT and respond promptly to any requests for additional information. A well-prepared objection, backed by legal reasoning and solid documentation, significantly increases the chances of a favorable outcome.
If the objection decision is not in the taxpayer’s favor, the next available remedy is to appeal to the Tax Court. This must be filed within three months of receiving the objection decision. The Tax Court is a specialized court with exclusive jurisdiction over tax disputes, and its judges are trained in both law and taxation. This means the proceedings are typically more technical and require a higher standard of legal and factual presentation.
The appeal process involves several distinct stages: registration, preliminary review, exchange of evidence, hearings, and finally, the issuance of a decision. During the hearing, both the taxpayer and the DGT are allowed to present their arguments and submit additional evidence. Unlike the objection process, the Tax Court permits the introduction of new facts and documents, offering the taxpayer another chance to strengthen their case. The court’s decision is final and legally binding, though judicial review remains available under specific circumstances.
Judicial review, known in Indonesia as Peninjauan Kembali, is the final legal recourse for taxpayers dissatisfied with the Tax Court’s decision. However, it can only be pursued under limited circumstances, such as the discovery of new evidence (novum), a grave error in legal interpretation, or procedural violations during the trial. The request for judicial review must be submitted within three months from the date the new evidence was found or the error was discovered. Although this stage is rarely successful, it provides an important legal safety net for cases with compelling new facts or significant procedural irregularities.
In some instances, especially involving customs and excise, the Indonesian tax authority may offer alternative dispute resolution methods such as negotiation or mediation. These informal processes are not strictly regulated but are often encouraged by the authorities to expedite resolution and reduce litigation. While not suitable for all cases, ADR can be highly effective in situations where both parties are willing to compromise. Taxpayers should consult with their legal counsel to assess the viability of ADR, especially during or after a tax audit.
READ MORE:
| Stage | Legal Deadline |
| Filing Objection | Within 3 months from SKP date |
| DGT Decision | Within 12 months of objection filing |
| Appeal to Tax Court | Within 3 months from DGT decision |
| Judicial Review | Within 3 months from discovery of novum |
| Prepayment Requirement | Tax must be paid before objection |
Meeting these deadlines is critical. Failure to comply will result in your case being automatically rejected, regardless of its merits. Thus, maintaining an accurate compliance calendar and seeking professional advice are non-negotiable elements of successful tax dispute management.
When it comes to tax disputes, a proactive approach is always better than a reactive one. Businesses should regularly assess their tax risk exposure, particularly in high-risk areas such as transfer pricing and VAT. It’s equally important to maintain meticulous documentation, including contracts, invoices, and internal memos that support your tax position. Furthermore, consider conducting internal tax audits to identify and address potential issues before the tax authorities do. From a strategic perspective, it’s often wise to engage tax professionals early in the dispute process to build a strong, well-documented case that can withstand scrutiny at every legal stage.
READ MORE:
At Kusuma & Partners, we understand that every tax dispute is unique and requires a tailored legal strategy. Our experience shows that early intervention, supported by a comprehensive legal and financial review, can dramatically improve the outcome of a dispute. We have assisted numerous clients—from SMEs to multinational corporations—in navigating objections, appeals, and even judicial reviews. One of the most common pitfalls we encounter is clients waiting too long before seeking legal counsel. By the time the case reaches the Tax Court, crucial documentation may already be lost or incomplete. Don’t let this happen to your business.
Understanding the tax dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia is not just a matter of legal compliance—it’s about protecting your business. With the right knowledge, preparation, and legal representation, tax disputes can be resolved efficiently and favorably. Whether you’re at the audit stage or already in court, knowing your rights and obligations under Indonesian tax law is your best defense. Take action before it becomes too late.
Facing a tax audit or dispute in Indonesia? Reach out to ustoday. Our experienced tax lawyers are ready to assist you at every stage—from audit to appeal.
Fill in the form below to get our expert guidance.
“DISCLAIMER: This content is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be treated as legal advice. For professional advice, please consult with us.”
Receiving a letter from the Indonesian Tax Authority (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, or DGT) can make anyone nervous, especially when it’s an SP2DK (Surat Permintaan Penjelasan atas Data dan/atau Keterangan). For business owners, investors, finance directors, or even individual taxpayers, this document can feel intimidating. But an SP2DK is not a tax penalty. Instead, it’s a […]
Indonesia’s arbitration landscape has long been shaped by the Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI), the country’s premier arbitration institution. With globalization and the surge of cross-border business, BANI has steadily evolved to align with international best practices. The 2025 BANI Arbitration Rules mark a pivotal shift, representing a bold leap forward toward modernization, transparency, and […]
Outsourcing has become a widely adopted strategy for companies seeking operational efficiency and cost reduction. In Indonesia, outsourcing arrangements are common — but often misunderstood. For foreign and domestic companies alike, outsourcing may seem like a straightforward solution, but beneath the surface lie several legal and regulatory complexities that, if not addressed properly, can expose […]
