In Indonesia’s vibrant corporate landscape, not all shareholders have equal power. While majority shareholders often dominate corporate decisions, minority shareholders—those who own a smaller portion of shares—still have vital interests to protect. Whether you’re a foreign investor holding 10% of a local company or a founding member slowly diluted over time, protecting your stake is not just a desire—it’s your legal right.
The foundation of shareholder protection in Indonesia is laid out in Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company (Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas or “UUPT”). It governs the rights and obligations of shareholders and ensures a system of checks and balances within companies.
In practice, minority shareholders are more vulnerable to abuse, including exclusion from important decisions, unfair dividend policies, or even mismanagement. This makes protective mechanisms under the law crucial.
Article 50 and Article 100 of the Company Law grant shareholders access to company data. However, minority shareholders often face roadblocks in practice. Legally, they are entitled to financial statements, corporate resolutions, and board meeting summaries.
Minority shareholders are entitled to attend and vote in the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). Although their votes may not always influence outcomes, certain decisions—like mergers or liquidation—require a higher quorum, giving minority groups strategic leverage.
All shareholders, regardless of size, are entitled to dividends proportionate to their shareholding. If the company distributes profits selectively or fails to distribute dividends without justification, legal remedies are available.
READ MORE:
If directors or commissioners cause harm to the company through negligence or abuse of power, Article 97(6) and Article 114(6) allow shareholders (holding at least 1 share) to file derivative lawsuits on behalf of the company.
This mechanism is critical for minority shareholders to ensure corporate accountability without needing majority support.
Article 146 of the Company Law permits minority shareholders—holding at least 10%—to file a petition for dissolution if the company’s activities are deemed contrary to the objectives stated in the Articles of Association or if mismanagement occurs.
In cases of oppression, fraud, or embezzlement, minority shareholders can take civil or criminal actions against the board or majority shareholders, especially if personal interests are being jeopardized.
In 2023, the South Jakarta District Court ruled in favor of a minority shareholder of PT XYZ who was denied access to board meeting minutes and dividend rights. The court upheld their right to transparency and proportionate profit distribution, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in protecting minority shareholders.
This decision sent a powerful message: Indonesian courts are increasingly willing to safeguard minority interests when evidence and legal standing are strong.
Pre-emptive contracts like shareholders agreements (SHA) can empower minority shareholders. Clauses may include:
Minority investors can negotiate for board seats—a strategic way to influence decisions and stay informed.
These clauses are critical in the event of share sales:
READ MORE:
The Financial Services Authority (OJK) oversees transparency and investor protection for public companies. Minority shareholders in listed companies can lodge complaints and request investigations.
Meanwhile, the commercial courts handle private company disputes. Remedies may include injunctions, compensation, annulment of GMS resolutions, or company dissolution.
While the law offers protection, challenges include:
These hurdles emphasize the need for robust preventive legal strategies from the outset of shareholding.
At Kusuma & Partners Law Firm, we frequently assist minority shareholders—both local and foreign—who face exclusion from key decisions, lack of dividend clarity, or dilution of shares without consent. Many of these issues could have been avoided with well-drafted shareholders agreements that include tag-along rights, board representation, or reserved matters requiring unanimous approval.
In our experience, minority shareholders often wait too long to act. We advise clients to seek legal advice proactively—especially when entering new ventures or sensing mismanagement. The Indonesian legal framework provides strong protection, but timely and strategic intervention is crucial to preserve your rights and avoid costly disputes.
Minority shareholders may be small in number, but they’re not powerless. The legal system in Indonesia—backed by Law No. 40 of 2007—provides both preventive and reactive tools to defend your interests. The key lies in knowing your rights, asserting them wisely, and getting trusted legal guidance.
How We Can Help
Need help protecting your minority shareholder rights? Please contact us today.
Fill in the form below to get our expert guidance.
“DISCLAIMER: This content is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be treated as legal advice. For professional advice, please consult with us.”

A Share Pledge Agreement Indonesia is one of the most crucial security instruments used in business financing, foreign investment, joint ventures, and corporate debt transactions in Indonesia. Whether you are a lender, investor, venture capitalist, private equity firm, or business owner, understanding how share pledges work will determine how secure your investment truly is. With […]

Over the past decade, Indonesia has undergone a significant transformation in tax administration. The government’s commitment to strengthening fiscal transparency, driven by the Harmonized Tax Law (HPP Law) and the introduction of digital tax systems, has made corporate tax behaviour a central focus of regulatory oversight. Companies that once viewed taxation merely as a compliance […]

If you intend to establish, acquire, or invest in a company in Indonesia, you will encounter the country’s distinctive two-tier board system, which separates management under the Board of Directors (Direksi) from supervision under the Board of Commissioners (Dewan Komisaris). This separation is not merely formal, it defines who holds the authority to bind the […]