Logo Kusuma & Partners Law Firm
Home / Article / Legal Risks of Nominee Shareholder Arrangements in Indonesia

Legal Risks of Nominee Shareholder Arrangements in Indonesia

Share article:

Table Of Contents

Using nominee shareholders may seem like a quick solution for foreigners looking to tap into Indonesia’s lucrative market. But is it really safe? As tempting as it sounds, this shortcut could backfire—legally and financially. Let’s unpack the legal risks of nominee shareholder arrangements in Indonesia and explore safer alternatives for your business.

Key Takeaways

  • Nominee arrangements are widely used but legally risky under Indonesian law.
  • Such setups may violate foreign investment rules and be deemed null and void.
  • Legal ownership always trumps private agreements in Indonesia.
  • Criminal, civil, and tax liabilities may arise for both nominee and beneficiary.
  • Lawful alternatives like PT PMA offer safer and enforceable options for foreign investors.

Understanding Nominee Shareholder Arrangements

A nominee shareholder is someone who holds shares on behalf of another person—typically, a foreign investor. In Indonesia, this setup is commonly used when foreign ownership in certain sectors is restricted.

Why Foreigners Use Nominee Shareholders in Indonesia

Many foreign investors turn to nominee shareholders to bypass the Negative Investment List (now the Positive Investment List under Presidential Regulation No. 10 of 2021). They want to operate in sectors where full foreign ownership is not permitted. However, this workaround may open the door to unintended consequences.

Indonesian Legal Framework: Is It Legal?

Here’s where the problem starts. Nominee structures are not explicitly regulated under Indonesian law—but they are also not recognized as valid ownership.

1. Investment Law and Foreign Ownership Restrictions

Under Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, all foreign investments must be conducted through a PT PMA (foreign direct investment company). Using an Indonesian citizen to “hold shares on behalf of” a foreigner is not a recognized mechanism for foreign ownership.

2. Fiduciary Relationships vs. Legal Ownership

The legal system in Indonesia recognizes de jure (legal) ownership—not beneficial or economic ownership unless it is formally structured. A foreign party hiding behind an Indonesian nominee may be left with no enforceable rights.

Common Nominee Structures in Indonesia

Nominee arrangements take many forms. Understanding how they structure these arrangements can help you recognize the risks involved.

1. Individual Nominees vs. Corporate Nominees

Some use individuals—friends, employees, or local partners—as nominees. Others create an Indonesian company to act as the shareholder. In both cases, ownership remains under the name of the nominee, not the foreign investor.

2. Use of Loan Agreements or Power of Attorney

Some foreign parties sign “loan agreements” or powers of attorney to control the nominee. However, Indonesian courts often disregard these as attempts to circumvent investment regulations.

READ MORE:

Key Legal Risks of Nominee Shareholder Arrangements in Indonesia

Let’s look deeper at why nominee arrangements can become a legal landmine.

1. Ownership Invalidity and Non-Enforceability

Courts may declare nominee arrangements null and void. Even with signed contracts, the authorities may not legally enforce ownership that doesn’t align with licensing and BKPM approvals.

2. Potential Criminal Exposure

Article 33 of the Indonesian Company Law and Article 263 of the Criminal Code (regarding false documents) may apply in nominee cases. Misrepresenting ownership to authorities could lead to criminal sanctions.

3. Tax Risks and Unreported Interests

Unreported ownership structures may raise red flags with Indonesian tax authorities. Tax authorities may subject beneficial owners to tax audits, impose penalties, or even accuse them of tax evasion.

4. Legal Disputes and Lack of Legal Standing

If a dispute arises, the foreign “owner” has no legal standing to sue or defend their interest in court. You’re essentially investing without protection.

Landmark Court Decisions on Nominee Structures

The case of PT Asuransi Jiwa Manulife Indonesia vs. PT Tirta Amarta Bottling highlighted that agreements violating investment laws may be unenforceable. The courts tend to protect the formal shareholder on paper, not the “real” owner behind the scenes.

Real-World Scenarios: When It Goes Wrong

  • A foreign investor loses their hotel in Bali after a nominee refuses to transfer shares back.
  • A partnership collapses when a nominee unexpectedly sells the shares.
  • Disputes over control become impossible to resolve legally.

These are not rare—they’re frequent cautionary tales.

READ MORE:

Regulatory Trends and Future Enforcement Risks

Indonesia is moving toward greater investment transparency and tax enforcement. Cross-border data sharing, beneficial ownership disclosure (OJK & PPATK), and stricter BKPM requirements increase risks for hidden ownership.

Legal Alternatives to Nominee Arrangements

Instead of taking shortcuts, here are smarter options:

1. PT PMA as a Legitimate Investment Vehicle

Set up a PT PMA, get BKPM approval, and operate lawfully. Foreigners can now fully own businesses in many sectors.

2. Strategic Structuring Within the Law

Consider joint ventures with legally compliant frameworks, profit-sharing agreements, or holding companies—structured by legal professionals, not templates.

Practical Commentary from Kusuma & Partners

At Kusuma & Partners, we regularly advise clients who have unknowingly stepped into nominee traps. We’ve seen cases where parties lost millions of dollars due to unenforceable nominee contracts Our recommendation is clear: always structure your investment lawfully. We help clients set up PT PMA, navigate licensing with BKPM, and protect their investments from hidden legal liabilities. If you’re already in a nominee setup, we can assist in risk mitigation or restructuring.

Conclusion

Nominee shareholder arrangements may seem convenient—but in Indonesia, they’re a legal minefield. From ownership invalidity to criminal exposure, the risks are far-reaching. Fortunately, there are lawful ways to invest and operate in Indonesia, and they offer stronger protection and clarity.

How We Can Help

If you’re considering investing in Indonesia or are currently using a nominee arrangement, consult us today. Let our expert lawyers help you secure your business the right way. Book your free consultation now.

Fill in the form below to get our expert guidance.

“DISCLAIMER: This content is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be treated as legal advice. For professional advice, please consult with us.”

Legally, you may have no standing to enforce the agreement. You could lose your entire investment.

Yes. Indonesia’s tax authority and anti-money laundering agency (PPATK) are increasingly active in tracing beneficial ownership.

Absolutely. We specialize in restructuring and compliance for foreign investors.

Contact us

Related News

Copyright © 2025 Kusuma Law Firm. All right reserved